Skip to main content
Read page text
page 1
T H E T A B L E T . A Weekly N ewspaper a n d R ev iew . E U M VOBIS G R A T ü L A M U R , A N IM O S E T IA M A D D IM U S TJT IN IN CCEPTIS V E S T E 1S C C N S T A N T E K M A K E A T IS . From the B r i e f oj H is Holiness P iu s IX . to T h e T a b l e t , June 4, 1870. V ol. 112. No. 3,580. L ondon, D e c e m b e r 19, 1908. P r ic e 5-d., b y P o s t sJ£d, R e g i s t e r e d a t t h e G e n e r a l P o s t O f f i c e a s a N ew s pa p e r . C hronicle o f t h e W e e k : Page j Imperial Parliament: The Hop Substitutes Bill — The Miners’ E ight Hours Bill— The i ords and the Port of London B ill— Opposition to Dear Coal—Read a Second Time — Wednesday’s Sitting — Mr. Roosevelt and Panama— Foreign Patents in Engla n d— The Prime Minister and Sweated Industries— State Ownership of Cables—M u tiry and Desertion in Algeria — The French Senate and the Budget . . . . 957 T opic s o f t h e D a y : Children and the Drink-Shops . . 961 C O N T E N T S . T opics (Continued): A Penalty for Mass-Going The Lille Congress . . Personal Studies N o t e s . . R ev ie w s : Page . . 961 . . 963 993 963 The Shores of the Adriatic . . 966 Ideals of Charity . . . . . . 967 The Money-Changers . . . . 967 The Cardinal Democrat . . . . 968 A Textual _Concordance o f the Holy Scriptures . . . . . . 96S Books for the Young . . . . 958 Literary N o te s . . . . . . . . 968 Books of the W e e k ......................... 970 Page St. Vincent de Paul Society . . 970 Chances for Christmas Charity . . 970 E t Cætera ....................................... 971 C orrespondence : Rome :— (From Our Own Corre­ spondent) ....................................... 973 News from France . . . . . . 974 L e t t e r s t o t h e E d it o r : The Education Difficulty . . . . 975 A Grievance o f Architects.. . . 975 The Religion of the Thirty-Nine Articles . . . . . . . . 976 Glastonbury A bbey.. . . . . 977 “ O Sapientia ” 977 A French Marriage in London . . 977 St. Mary’s College, Oscott . . . . 977 N ew s from t h e D io c e s e s : Westminster.. . . . . . . 981 Page S o u t h w a r k .......................................982 Hexham and Newcastle . . . . 984 Middlesbrough . . . . 984 P l y m o u t h ......................... . . 984 O b it u a r y ........................................... 986 S o c ia l a n d P o l it i c a l . . . . 98S S U P P L EM E N T . Educational Notes . . . . . . 989 Catholic Action . . . . 991 Dead Bill No. IV .................................993 Our Colleges and Schools . . _ 994 Educational Questions in Parliament 995 The Low Valley School . . . . 980 Rejected M S , cannot be returned unless accompanied w ith address and postage. CHRONICLE OF THE WEEK. T H E T A B L E T will be issued on TH U R SD A Y in Christmas week. A il correspondence, &c., should reach the Office n o t l a t e r than Wednesday morning. NOT AN DA. ------------ *----------- The Archbishop of Paris tells the Catholics of Lille of the Eucharistic Congress in London. His impressions o f what he saw (p. 963). The cause of the “ Pucelle.” The date of the Beatifica tion (p. 973). The new Vice-Rector of the Beda. A sketch o f his career (p. 966). The Bishop of Salford, asked to allow Catholic schools to be used for the purposes o f “ the Catholic Socialistic Society,” replies in the negative and adds that he “ feels bound in conscience to express his entire disapproval o f any Catholic joining the ranks of any society which professes itself Socialist, or is in any way allied with the system known as Socialism ” (p. 965). Various estimates as to the cost to Catholics of contracting-out under Mr. Runciman’s Bill. The caution with which they should be received (pp. 989, 993). A full account of the Milner Centenary at Oscott <P- 977) What they thought of the Education Bill at Preston. Wanted— a general election (p. 991). Nc abstinence on New Year’s Day (p. 9S6). New Series. Vol. LXXX. No. 2,979. IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT THE HOP SUBSTITUTES BILL. T H E Chancellor of the Exchequer has been so far impressed with the difficulties of the hop industry that, whilst unwilling to place any restriction on the import o f bops from abroad, he has introduced a Bill to prohibit the use o f hop substitutes in brewing, and providing for the marking of foreign hops. This Bill was accorded a Second Reading in the Commons last week, and has been referred to a Commitee o f the whole House. In its first section the Bill provides that a brewer for sale shall not use any hop substitute in the brewing of beer, and shall not receive or have in his custody or possession on any entered premises any beer containing any hop substitute or in the brewing o f which any hop substitute has been used, or (except for domestic use, the proof whereof shall lie on him) any hop substitute. For a contravention of this section there will be an Excise penalty of ;£ io o and forfeiture of the article. “ Hop substitutes ” are defined as any bitter article or bitter substance, other than hops, capable of being used in the brewing o f beer, including any preparation of hops the use of which in brewing has not been previously sanctioned by the Commissioners for the time being having the management o f the duties c f Excise, As to importation, it is provided that no hops shall be imported into the United Kingdom except in bags, or pockets, marked on the outside with durable ink or paint, in plain and legible words and figures, o f not less than three inches in length and half an inch in breadth, with the following particulars : the name of the owner, planter, or grower of the hops, the country and the year in which they were grown, and the gross weight of each bag or pocket. For non-compliance with these rules an importer will be liable, on summary conviction, to a fine not exceeding ^ 2 0 for every bag or pocket. The Commissioners of Customs will have power to detain any hops imported for home use and not so marked to enable them to be so marked by the importer, who must pay any expenses incurred, and if they are not marked within fourteen days after the date of importation, or such further period as the Commissioners may allow, the hops may be removed to the King’s Warehouse.

T H E T A B L E T .

A Weekly N ewspaper a n d R ev iew .

E U M VOBIS G R A T ü L A M U R , A N IM O S E T IA M A D D IM U S TJT IN IN CCEPTIS V E S T E 1S C C N S T A N T E K M A K E A T IS .

From the B r i e f oj H is Holiness P iu s IX . to T h e T a b l e t , June 4, 1870.

V ol. 112. No. 3,580. L ondon, D e c e m b e r 19, 1908. P r ic e 5-d., b y P o s t sJ£d,

R e g i s t e r e d a t t h e G e n e r a l P o s t O f f i c e a s a N ew s pa p e r .

C hronicle o f t h e W e e k :

Page j

Imperial Parliament: The Hop Substitutes Bill — The Miners’ E ight Hours Bill— The i ords and the Port of London B ill— Opposition to Dear Coal—Read a Second Time — Wednesday’s Sitting — Mr. Roosevelt and Panama— Foreign Patents in Engla n d— The Prime Minister and Sweated Industries— State Ownership of Cables—M u tiry and Desertion in Algeria — The French Senate and the Budget . . . . 957 T opic s o f t h e D a y :

Children and the Drink-Shops . . 961

C O N T E N T S .

T opics (Continued):

A Penalty for Mass-Going The Lille Congress . . Personal Studies N o t e s . . R ev ie w s :

Page . . 961 . . 963

993 963

The Shores of the Adriatic . . 966 Ideals of Charity . . . . . . 967 The Money-Changers . . . . 967 The Cardinal Democrat . . . . 968 A Textual _Concordance o f the

Holy Scriptures . . . . . . 96S Books for the Young . . . . 958 Literary N o te s . . . . . . . . 968 Books of the W e e k ......................... 970

Page

St. Vincent de Paul Society . . 970 Chances for Christmas Charity . . 970 E t Cætera ....................................... 971 C orrespondence :

Rome :— (From Our Own Corre­

spondent) ....................................... 973 News from France . . . . . . 974 L e t t e r s t o t h e E d it o r :

The Education Difficulty . . . . 975 A Grievance o f Architects.. . . 975 The Religion of the Thirty-Nine

Articles . . . . . . . . 976 Glastonbury A bbey.. . . . . 977 “ O Sapientia ” 977 A French Marriage in London . . 977

St. Mary’s College, Oscott . . . . 977 N ew s from t h e D io c e s e s : Westminster.. . . . . . . 981

Page

S o u t h w a r k .......................................982 Hexham and Newcastle . . . . 984 Middlesbrough . . . . 984 P l y m o u t h ......................... . . 984 O b it u a r y ........................................... 986 S o c ia l a n d P o l it i c a l . . . . 98S

S U P P L EM E N T . Educational Notes . . . . . . 989 Catholic Action . . . . 991 Dead Bill No. IV .................................993 Our Colleges and Schools . . _ 994 Educational Questions in Parliament 995 The Low Valley School . . . . 980

Rejected M S , cannot be returned unless accompanied w ith address and postage.

CHRONICLE OF THE WEEK.

T H E T A B L E T will be issued on TH U R SD A Y in Christmas week. A il correspondence, &c., should reach the Office n o t l a t e r than Wednesday morning.

NOT AN DA. ------------ *-----------

The Archbishop of Paris tells the Catholics of Lille of the Eucharistic Congress in London. His impressions o f what he saw (p. 963).

The cause of the “ Pucelle.” The date of the Beatifica tion (p. 973).

The new Vice-Rector of the Beda. A sketch o f his career (p. 966).

The Bishop of Salford, asked to allow Catholic schools to be used for the purposes o f “ the Catholic Socialistic Society,” replies in the negative and adds that he “ feels bound in conscience to express his entire disapproval o f any Catholic joining the ranks of any society which professes itself Socialist, or is in any way allied with the system known as Socialism ” (p. 965).

Various estimates as to the cost to Catholics of contracting-out under Mr. Runciman’s Bill. The caution with which they should be received (pp. 989, 993).

A full account of the Milner Centenary at Oscott

What they thought of the Education Bill at Preston. Wanted— a general election (p. 991).

Nc abstinence on New Year’s Day (p. 9S6).

New Series. Vol. LXXX. No. 2,979.

IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT

THE HOP SUBSTITUTES BILL. T H E Chancellor of the Exchequer has been so far impressed with the difficulties of the hop industry that, whilst unwilling to place any restriction on the import o f bops from abroad, he has introduced a Bill to prohibit the use o f hop substitutes in brewing, and providing for the marking of foreign hops. This Bill was accorded a Second Reading in the Commons last week, and has been referred to a Commitee o f the whole House. In its first section the Bill provides that a brewer for sale shall not use any hop substitute in the brewing of beer, and shall not receive or have in his custody or possession on any entered premises any beer containing any hop substitute or in the brewing o f which any hop substitute has been used, or (except for domestic use, the proof whereof shall lie on him) any hop substitute. For a contravention of this section there will be an Excise penalty of ;£ io o and forfeiture of the article. “ Hop substitutes ” are defined as any bitter article or bitter substance, other than hops, capable of being used in the brewing o f beer, including any preparation of hops the use of which in brewing has not been previously sanctioned by the Commissioners for the time being having the management o f the duties c f Excise, As to importation, it is provided that no hops shall be imported into the United Kingdom except in bags, or pockets, marked on the outside with durable ink or paint, in plain and legible words and figures, o f not less than three inches in length and half an inch in breadth, with the following particulars : the name of the owner, planter, or grower of the hops, the country and the year in which they were grown, and the gross weight of each bag or pocket. For non-compliance with these rules an importer will be liable, on summary conviction, to a fine not exceeding ^ 2 0 for every bag or pocket. The Commissioners of Customs will have power to detain any hops imported for home use and not so marked to enable them to be so marked by the importer, who must pay any expenses incurred, and if they are not marked within fourteen days after the date of importation, or such further period as the Commissioners may allow, the hops may be removed to the King’s Warehouse.

My Bookmarks


Skip to main content